Publishing Readiness Programme

This programme is a structured, hands-on workshop designed to help research teams consistently produce publication-ready papers. Rather than offering generic writing advice, the programme focuses on the most common reasons manuscripts fail during peer review and trains participants to identify, prevent, and correct these issues before submission.

This is not a writing retreat or an editing service. Participants bring their own drafts and develop the capability to revise them to publication standard.

Why institutions choose this programme

Institutions engage with this programme to improve publishing outcomes at scale, not to fix individual papers.

Specifically, it helps departments:

  • Reduce repeated desk rejections and prolonged revision cycles

  • Improve consistency in manuscript quality across research teams

  • Lower supervisory and senior academic workload

  • Strengthen publication confidence among early- and mid-career researchers

  • Build sustainable publishing capability rather than relying on ad hoc support

The programme is applicable across qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research.

Who this programme is for

This programme is designed for:

  • Research-active staff preparing manuscripts for journal submission

  • Early- and mid-career researchers developing publication judgment

  • Research teams seeking shared standards for writing and revision

  • Departments aiming to improve publication quality and efficiency.

It works best with participants who already have data or draft manuscripts and want to move toward submission with confidence.

Program Structure

  • Session 1

    Is This Paper Publishable?

    How editors and reviewers actually evaluate manuscripts. Participants learn how journal fit is judged and why many seemingly complete papers are not ready for submission.

  • Session 2

    Building a Coherent Paper

    Aligning research questions, theory, methods, results, and conclusions so the paper tells a clear and defensible story.

  • Session 3

    Framing Contribution and Significance

    Writing introductions and discussions that clearly articulate what the paper contributes, why it matters, and to whom.

  • Session 4

    Making Methods and Results Convincing

    Presenting methods and results so they withstand reviewer scrutiny. Emphasis on transparency, justification of analytical choices, and anticipating concerns about rigor and credibility.

  • Session 5

    Editing at Reviewer Level

    Training participants to edit for clarity, precision, and tone at the sentence and paragraph level. Focus on common stylistic issues that trigger negative reviewer reactions.

  • Session 6

    Submitting and Revising Strategically

    Journal selection, responding to peer review, prioritizing revisions, and managing multiple revision rounds to improve acceptance odds.

Trusted by Research Teams

We have delivered workshops and programmes focused on systematic reviews, evidence synthesis, responsible use of AI in research, and research capacity building at:

Ready to sign up?

If you are interested in delivering this programme for your team or department, the next step is a short consultation. This conversation helps us:

  • Understand your institutional goals and context

  • Clarify participant profile and career stage

  • Agree on delivery format, scope, and timelines.

Book a Consultation

Certificate included

✺ Frequently asked questions ✺

  • No. The programme focuses on core principles of academic writing, revision, and peer review that apply across qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research. Examples and discussion can be tailored to disciplinary context where helpful..

  • Ideally, yes. The programme is most effective when participants bring a draft manuscript or outline. However, researchers at earlier stages can still benefit by applying the principles to works in progress.

  • No. This programme does not involve line-by-line editing or rewriting participants’ papers. Instead, it develops the capability to diagnose, revise, and strengthen manuscripts independently, to publication standard.

  • Sessions are highly interactive, centred on real examples, common failure patterns, and applied discussion. While content is structured, the emphasis is on judgment, decision-making, and application, not passive instruction.

  • The programme is delivered online.